Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Power sector carbon reduction review for South Korea in 2030

Authors
Choo, HyunwoongKim, Yong-GunKim, Dongwoo
Issue Date
May-2024
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
Carbon abatement cost; Carbon reduction in power sector; Carbon tax; Coal–ammonia co-firing; Levelized cost of electricity; New 2030 NDC target; Nuclear restoration; Renewables expansion
Citation
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v.196, pp 1 - 21
Pages
21
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume
196
Start Page
1
End Page
21
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/118269
DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114348
ISSN
1364-0321
Abstract
This study investigates the cost-effectiveness and decarbonization of four essential carbon reduction strategies to achieve Korea's recent 2030 NDC (Nationally Determined Contribution) goal in the power sector. Examining overseas experiences and identifying potentials and challenges in implementing these strategies in Korea, this study explores the performance of future Korean power systems under fifty-four configurations combining these strategies. The evaluation results indicate that: 1) Thirty-one of the fifty-four tested configurations can achieve the emission target (149.9 MtCO2e) with carbon abatement costs (COA) ranging from -$89 to $105/tCO2e. The optimal configuration with the lowest COA is a combination of nuclear restoration and renewable expansion strategies. 2) Renewable expansion significantly reduces the COA and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). A pure renewable expansion strategy with photovoltaics of 68 GW and wind turbines of 35 GW attains the emission goal at a COA of -$54/tCO2e, in which the generation share of renewables reaches 42%. 3) A carbon tax of $104/tCO2e achieves the target if complemented by nuclear restoration. Otherwise, $120/tCO2e is needed. The COA and LCOE are increases by switching from cheap coal to expensive natural gas in both cases. 4) Twenty percent coal–ammonia co-firing combined with a carbon tax of $32/tCO2e and nuclear restoration can achieve the goal with relatively high costs compared with the optimal strategies. However, a co-firing strategy is limited because the generation shrinks at a minimum level when 40%∼ mixing ratios are applied, or when the fuel price gap between ammonia and natural gas becomes large. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES > SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Dong woo photo

Kim, Dong woo
ERICA 공학대학 (SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE