일한 양언어의 대응 관계를 통한 통사와 의미의 비대칭성

Abstract

The results of examination in this paper can be summarized by the following table. element insertion Scope of 「dake」and 「nai」 wide scope of 「dake」wide scope of 「nai」 TypeⅠ ◯ bi-clause ◯ mono-clause ◯ bi-clause TypeⅡ X bi-clause ◯ mono-clause ◯ bi-clause TypeⅢ X bi-clause ◯ mono-clause X bi-clause The above study result shows the asymmetry of the syntax and meaning, and the content of the analysis can be summarized as the follows. 1. If the「V-ageru」sentence is only considered, the 「V-ageru」sentence of pattern I and pattern II belongs to the same pattern where 「V」and 「ageru」 have the separate meaning of verb. But, it can be classified into the pattern I and pattern II when it is compared to its corresponding Korean expression. 2. the pattern II and pattern III of「V-ageru」sentence, when the「V-ageru」sentence is only considered, the pattern II has separate verb meaning one another like「V」and 「ageru」. But, pattern III belongs to the different pattern in which 「ageru」does not have separate meaning of verb. In spite of this fact, the results of the element intervention involvement test show the same syntactic structure one another. The above explanation shows the asymmetry of the syntax and meaning in which each of「V」and 「ageru」has a meaning of separate verb and different syntactic structures one another.