『五經文字』부수 분류의 표준과 소속자의 귀속 체례- 余嘉錫의 『五經文字』부수 평가에 대한 반박open accessThe Radical-rule and Arrangement System of Characters of Wu Jing Wen Zi: a Rebuttal of Yu Jiaxi’s View
- Other Titles
- The Radical-rule and Arrangement System of Characters of Wu Jing Wen Zi: a Rebuttal of Yu Jiaxi’s View
- Authors
- 이경원
- Issue Date
- Mar-2015
- Publisher
- 비교문화연구소
- Keywords
- 五經文字; 余嘉錫; 字樣學; 특수 부수 체계; 경전 이체자; 규범화; Wu Jing Wen Zi; Yu Jiaxi; Chinese orthography; radical-rule system; variant chinese Characters(異體字); standardization(規範化)
- Citation
- 비교문화연구, v.38, pp 385 - 404
- Pages
- 20
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 비교문화연구
- Volume
- 38
- Start Page
- 385
- End Page
- 404
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/20174
- DOI
- 10.21049/ccs.2015.38..385
- ISSN
- 1598-0685
2671-9088
- Abstract
- The Radical-rule and Arrangement System of Characters of WuJing Wen Zi: a Rebuttal of Yu Jiaxi’s ViewLee, KyeongwonCompiled in 776 by Zhang Shen, Wu Jing Wen Zi was regarded as the epitomeof model book for standardized regular script in Tang Dynasty. Following earlyworks like Shuo Wen Jie Zi, Zhang Shen adopted radical-rule for the compilationof this work. 3,250 characters were selected from the Five Classics and 160 radicalswere established. Yu Jiaxi (1884-1955) harshly criticized the radical system ofWu Jing Wen Zi for being inconsistant and confusing. With careful review andanalysis of examples from Wu Jing Wen Zi, this paper discusses the pupose ofthe compilation of this work, its unique radical-rule system, principles of arrangementof characters with the same or similar radicals, and the differentiation of variantcharacters. It further discusses the value of Wu Jing Wen Zi by its innovativeradical-rule and effective differentiation of variant characters. It concludes witha rebuttal of Yu Jiaxi’s argument and restate the necessity of reevaluation ofthis work even to this day.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - COLLEGE OF LANGUAGES & CULTURES > DEPARTMENT OF CHINESE STUDIES > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.