Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Analysis of a rich vapor compression method for an ammonia-based CO2 capture process and freshwater production using membrane distillation technology

Authors
Ullah, AsadSoomro, Mujeeb IqbalKim, Woo-Seung
Issue Date
Jul-2019
Publisher
Institute of Chemical Engineers
Keywords
CO2 capture process; Regeneration energy; Rich vapor compression; Total equivalent work
Citation
Chemical Engineering Research and Design, v.147, pp 244 - 258
Pages
15
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Volume
147
Start Page
244
End Page
258
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/2791
DOI
10.1016/j.cherd.2019.05.005
ISSN
0263-8762
1744-3563
Abstract
Post-combustion capturing of CO2 through chemical solvent absorption is a promising technique for reducing the CO2 emissions from fossil fuel power plants. However, the energy penalty associated with the absorbent regeneration continues to be a critical challenge in the chemical solvent absorption process. In this study, the operating parameters of ammonia-based CO2 capture were optimized to reduce the energy penalty. This optimized process was considered a base process to which process modifications were added, with the goal of further reducing the energy consumption. These process modifications included absorber inter-cooling and rich vapor compression (RVC) combined with cold solvent split (CSS) processes. The combined RVC and CSS process was compared with the base process and advanced NH3-based CO2 capture processes, such as the rich split process and the inter-heating process. Compared to the base process, the combined process reduced the energy requirements by 20.2%, which was higher than the 11.6% and 8.26% energy reductions obtained via the rich split and inter-heating processes, respectively. The combined process was also compared with MEA-based process modifications. The energy savings from the combined process were higher than those of the MEA-based process modifications. To estimate the trade-offs between the energy savings resulting from the combined process vs. the capital cost of the additional equipment required, the Aspen Capital Cost Estimator (ACCE) was used. The results showed that the combined process saved $0.707 million per year. Furthermore, a membrane distillation (MD) technology was integrated with the CO2 capture unit to produce freshwater. This additional process produced freshwater at a rate of 719.240 m(3)/day at a feed stream temperature to the MD unit of 35.66 degrees. (C) 2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES > DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE