Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

PUS가 적용된 지하벽체의 경제성 분석에 관한 연구A Study on the Economical Analysis of the PUS Applied to the Basement Wall

Other Titles
A Study on the Economical Analysis of the PUS Applied to the Basement Wall
Authors
노삼영김승훈홍성진박정태김갑수
Issue Date
Nov-2011
Publisher
대한건축학회
Keywords
CIP 공법; Uni-wall 공법; 지하벽체; 경제성 분석; CIP System; Uni-wall System; Basement Wall; Economical Analysis
Citation
대한건축학회논문집 구조계, v.27, no.11, pp 177 - 184
Pages
8
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
대한건축학회논문집 구조계
Volume
27
Number
11
Start Page
177
End Page
184
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/38785
ISSN
1226-9107
Abstract
In spite of the large stiffness of the CIP wall, it is used only as the temporary wall. Because it shows the problems of straightness and the poor unification in the joint between the each pile. Recently the Uni-wall method which improves the disadvantage of the CIP has been developed, still for the temporary wall. Therefore, the Uni-wall method is utilized and Permanent Uni-wall System(PUS) tries to be developed. In this research, the economic analysis with the current method of construction which is used like the CIP method+basement wall and slurry wall method as the underground permanent wall in order to evaluate the profitability of PUS was performed. At this time, the structure and construction condition used in the analysis considered the arbitrary environment and With respect to this, each basement wall was designed and the output of resources and construction cost was calculated and it applied to the analysis. At this time, the construction cost classified as the material cost, labor cost, and expenses and analyze. The material cost analyzed result, Type 1 section of PUS was required the most expensive cost and the slurry wall method was required the smallest cost. The labor cost analyzed result, slurry wall method needed the most abundant cost and PUS Type 1 section needed the smallest human resource. The expenses analyzed result, slurry wall method was required the most expensive cost and the CIP method+basement wall needed the lowest cost. The total construction cost analyzed result, slurry wall method was required most expensive cost and PUS Type 2 section showed up as the most economic method.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES > MAJOR IN ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Noh, Sam Young photo

Noh, Sam Young
ERICA 공학대학 (MAJOR IN ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE