Replies to Lee (2009): In Defence of a Double Clause Approach to the Right Dislocated Construction
- Authors
- 정대호
- Issue Date
- Sep-2010
- Publisher
- 현대문법학회
- Keywords
- right dislocated construction (RDC); ellipsis; double clause analysis (DCA); universal word order hypothesis
- Citation
- 현대문법연구, no.61, pp.167 - 196
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 현대문법연구
- Number
- 61
- Start Page
- 167
- End Page
- 196
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/40185
- ISSN
- 1226-3206
- Abstract
- Providing nine kinds of phenomena, Lee (2009: 130-149) tries to disprove the double clause approach (DCA) to the right dislocated construction (RDC) like Tanaka's (2001) elliptical bi-sentential analysis and Chung's (2008a, 2009) elliptical coordination analysis. This paper shows, however, that the phenomena pointed out by Lee (2009) as problems for the DCA do not in fact constitute real problems, either because some alternative analyses are available or because his data is not extensive enough. It will be also shown that Lee's (2007a, b, 2009) single clause analysis based on Kayne's (1994) universal SVO word order hypothesis faces difficulties (in addition to the ones pointed out by Chung 2009) accounting for the existence of subject (as well as object) appendix and for the absence of LCA effects in the gapless RDC. If we stay on the right track, the RDC cannot be taken as evidence for the claim that Korean conforms to the universal SVO word order hypothesis, pace Lee (2007a, b, 2009).
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - COLLEGE OF LANGUAGES & CULTURES > DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE & CULTURE > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/40185)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.