Detailed Information
Cited 0 time in 
Cited 0 time in 
Cited 0 time in
Metadata Downloads
On the Discrepancy Between Fronted Predicates vs. Fragmented Predicates
- Authors
- 정대호
- Issue Date
- Dec-2007
- Publisher
- 현대문법학회
- Keywords
- ellipsis; phrasal affix; predicate fronting; predicate fragment; Proper Binding Condition; Repair-by-Ellipsis; ellipsis; phrasal affix; predicate fronting; predicate fragment; Proper Binding Condition; Repair-by-Ellipsis
- Citation
- 현대문법연구, no.50, pp.1 - 26
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 현대문법연구
- Number
- 50
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 26
- ISSN
- 1226-3206
- Abstract
- This paper observes and tries to account for a discrepancy in grammaticality between predicate fronting vs. predicate fragments in Korean: Predicate fronting is banned in non-elliptical contexts, while predicate fragments are fine. The ban on predicate fronting in non-elliptical contexts is shown to follow from the constituency requirement on syntactic operations based on J. H. Yoon s (1993, 1994, 1997) phrasal affix analysis of verbal endings. Predicate fragments are shown to be permitted since what undergoes movement is not a predicate alone but a clause with all other elements (except for the predicate) suppressed.
- Files in This Item
- Go to Link
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Related Researcher
- Chung, Dae ho
- COLLEGE OF LANGUAGES & CULTURES (DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE & CULTURE)