Cytology-Ultrasonography Risk-Stratification Scoring System Based on Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and the Korean-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System
- Authors
- Hong, Min Ji; Na, Dong Gyu; Baek, Jung Hwan; Sung, Jin Yong; Kim, Ji-Hoon
- Issue Date
- Jul-2017
- Publisher
- MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
- Keywords
- thyroid; ultrasonography; biopsy; needle aspiration; cytology
- Citation
- THYROID, v.27, no.7, pp.953 - 959
- Journal Title
- THYROID
- Volume
- 27
- Number
- 7
- Start Page
- 953
- End Page
- 959
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/5938
- DOI
- 10.1089/thy.2016.0603
- ISSN
- 1050-7256
- Abstract
- Background: The malignancy risk of a cytology diagnosis may depend on the ultrasonography (US) patterns of thyroid nodules, and management should be determined by the combined malignancy risk of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology and US patterns. This study was performed to develop a clinically applicable cytology-ultrasonography (CU) scoring system for malignancy risk stratification based on FNA cytology and US patterns, according to the Korean-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS). Methods: This retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved study included 1651 thyroid nodules (1cm) with final diagnoses. The malignancy risk was assessed of the combined results of FNA cytology and the K-TIRADS for the development of the CU system. The interaction between FNA cytology and US pattern (K-TIRADS) in the malignancy risk of nodules was investigated by using a binominal test. Results: The malignancy risk of nodules could be stratified into four CU scores (very low risk, <3%; low risk, 3%, <30%; high risk, 30%, <90%; very high risk, 90%). In nodules with non-diagnostic, benign, and atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytology results, low-suspicion US pattern (K-TIRADS 3) significantly decreased the malignancy risk of nodules (p=0.003, 0.013, and 0.027, respectively), and a high-suspicion US pattern (K-TIRADS 5) significantly increased the malignancy risk of nodules (p0.001). A Bethesda 1 or 4 cytology result did not significantly change the malignancy risk of any K-TIRADS (p0.518 and p0.137, respectively). A Bethesda 2 cytology result decreased and a Bethesda 5 or 6 cytology result increased the malignancy risk of K-TIRADS 3, 4, and 5 (p0.001). A Bethesda 3 cytology result increased the malignancy risk of K-TIRADS 3 and 4 (p<0.001 and p=0.024, respectively). Conclusion: The malignancy risk of thyroid nodules can be stratified by the CU risk-stratification system, based on FNA cytology and the K-TIRADS. The proposed CU scoring system may be helpful in the management of thyroid nodules after FNA.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/5938)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.