Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET to Differentiate Subtypes of Dementia: The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors
Na, SeungheeKang, Dong WooKim, Geon HaKim, Ko WoonKim, YeshinKim, Hee-JinPark, Kee HyungPark, Young HoByeon, GihwanSuh, JeewonShin, Joon HyunShim, YongSooYang, YoungSoonUm, Yoo HyunOh, Seong-ilWang, Sheng-MinYoon, BoraYoon, Hai-JeonLee, Sun MinLee, JuyounLee, Jin SanRhee, Hak YoungLim, Jae-SungJung, Young HeeChin, JuheeHong, Yun JeongJang, HyeminChoi, HongyoonChoi, MiyoungJang, Jae-Won
Issue Date
Jan-2024
Publisher
대한치매학회
Keywords
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Dementia; Meta-Analysis; Alzheimer’s Disease; Frontotemporal Dementia; Lewy Body Disease
Citation
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지), v.23, no.1, pp 54 - 66
Pages
13
Journal Title
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지)
Volume
23
Number
1
Start Page
54
End Page
66
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/90346
DOI
10.12779/dnd.2024.23.1.54
ISSN
1738-1495
2384-0757
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management. Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the gold-standard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes. Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments. Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Kee Hyung photo

Park, Kee Hyung
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE