The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgeryopen access
- Authors
- Bae, Sung-Jin; Kim, Inah; Song, Jaechul; Chung, Euy-Suk
- Issue Date
- Feb-2022
- Publisher
- BioMed Central
- Keywords
- Prophylactic antibiotics; Surgical site infection; Propensity score matching; Medical expenditures
- Citation
- Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, v.17, no.1, pp 1 - 9
- Pages
- 9
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Volume
- 17
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 9
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/139529
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13019-022-01763-4
- ISSN
- 1749-8090
1749-8090
- Abstract
- Background
This study investigated the efficacy of first-generation (cefazolin) and third-generation (ceftizoxime) prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and the incidence of surgical site infections, hospitalizations, and medical costs.
Methods
All adult patients (≥ 20 years) undergoing cardiac surgery at one hospital from January 01, 2009, to December 31, 2016, were included in this study. A single prophylactic antibiotic was administered at a dose of 1 g within one hour of the surgical incision and for three days after surgery at eight-hour intervals. After propensity score matching, 194 patients in each antibiotic prophylaxis group (first-generation vs third-generation) were analyzed. Among the 388 patients, the incidence of surgical site infections was compared according to the type of prophylactic antibiotic, and risk factors were evaluated by chi-squared tests followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results
The incidence of deep surgical site infections was significantly lower in the first-generation group (5.7%) than in the third-generation group (16.5%). The pathogens isolated from the surgical infection sites were similarly distributed in both groups. However, the prevalence of highly infectious gram-positive bacteria was more than that of gram-negative bacteria (67% vs 23%). The preoperative hospitalization duration, mean operation time, and ventilator use time were similar in both groups, but the postoperative hospitalization duration was significantly shorter in the first-generation group (25.5 days) than in the third-generation group (29.8 days). In addition, the medical costs were lower in the first-generation group (20,594 USD) than in the third-generation group (26,488 USD).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the first-generation prophylactic antibiotic was better than the third-generation in reducing surgical site infection rates, hospitalization length, and medical expenditures.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 의과대학 > 서울 직업환경의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.