Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Comparison Between the Conventional and the Laryngoscope-Assisted Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Patients With Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Study

Authors
Kim, EugeneKim, Byung-GunLim, Young-JinJeon, Young-TaeHwang, Jung-WonLee, Seo-YunPark, Hee-Pyoung
Issue Date
Sep-2017
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citation
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, v.125, no.3, pp.854 - 859
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
Volume
125
Number
3
Start Page
854
End Page
859
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/151612
DOI
10.1213/ANE.0000000000001661
ISSN
0003-2999
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Positioning of a lightwand in the midline of the oral cavity can be challenging in patients with cervical immobilization. Direct laryngoscopy may permit the lightwand tip to more easily access the glottic opening. We tested our hypothesis that a laryngoscope-assisted lightwand technique allows more successful endotracheal intubation than does a conventional lightwand approach. METHODS: A total of 162 patients requiring cervical immobilization during intubation for cervical spine surgery were allocated randomly to 2 groups. The conventional lightwand technique (group C, n = 80) or the laryngoscope-assisted lightwand technique (group L, n = 82) was used for endotracheal intubation. In the group L, a Macintosh laryngoscope was inserted into the oral cavity, advanced until the epiglottis tip was visible, but not used to lift the epiglottis tip. The lightwand tip was placed below the epiglottis under direct view of the epiglottis tip. The primary outcome (the initial intubation success rate) and secondary outcomes (intubation time, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative airway complications) were evaluated. RESULTS: The initial intubation success rate was significantly lower (75% vs 89%; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 1.2 [1.0-1.4]; P = .034) in group C than group L. The intubation time (22 +/- 13 vs 24 +/- 12 seconds; mean difference [98.33% confidence interval]: 2.4 [-2.3 to 7.2]; P = .217) did not differ between groups. Postoperative sore throat score, incidences of hypertension and tachycardia, postoperative oral mucosal bleeding, and hoarseness also did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngoscope-assisted lightwand intubation did not increase intubation time, and it increased first attempt intubation rates compared with traditional lightwand intubation in patients requiring cervical immobilization for cervical spine surgery.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 마취통증의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Eugene photo

Kim, Eugene
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIA AND MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE