Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

훼손지 유형에 따른 생태복원 평가방법 개발Evaluation Method Development for Ecological Restorations by Damaged Types

Other Titles
Evaluation Method Development for Ecological Restorations by Damaged Types
Authors
최재용이상혁이솔애지승용이상훈
Issue Date
Feb-2016
Publisher
한국환경복원기술학회
Keywords
Evaluation index; Ecological restoration; Landscape analysis; Sustainable monitoring; Restoration management
Citation
한국환경복원기술학회지, v.19, no.1, pp.121 - 133
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
한국환경복원기술학회지
Volume
19
Number
1
Start Page
121
End Page
133
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/155090
DOI
10.13087/kosert.2016.19.1.121
ISSN
1229-3032
Abstract
It was required to evaluate ecological restorations in a comprehensive way in order to systematically manage conservation areas such as DMZ and national parks in South Korea. In this research we developed a new approach to evaluating ecological restorations with more various indexes than vegetation covering-related indexes. By analyzing damaged areas in the vicinity of DMZ, major damaged types were identified as six classes: landform modification, surface loss, soil pollution, soil physio-chemical modification, vegetation decline and vegetation damaged. From literature review, 39 indexes were selected and were grouped into four divisions: soil property, vegetation growth & structure, habitat property and landscape structure & functions. By conducting a survey with the selected indexes targeting relevant experts, data on relative importance among the divisions and indexes by damaged type were collected. As a result, it was found that the orders and values of weighted values of the divisions were different by damaged type: for example, soil property (0.402), vegetation growth & structure (0.209), habitat property (0.225), landscape structure & function (0.163) for “landform modification”; but soil property (0.171), vegetation growth & structure (0.401), habitat property (0.270), landscape structure & function (0.158) for “vegetation decline”. Similarly, evaluation indexes showed different orders and values of relative importance, easiness in field measurement and representativeness for the division by damaged type, and the values were used for calculating importance factor for each index. In the evaluation table, score1 and score2 were made by the importance factors of indexes multiplied by distribution values which present grades and by the weighted values of divisions. In conclusion, while dealing with the damaged type was considered significant for evaluating and managing restorations, further tests on this table with a range of cases were needed to improve its quality.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 도시대학원 > 서울 도시·지역개발경영학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Peter Sang Hoon photo

Lee, Peter Sang Hoon
GRADUATE SCHOOL OF URBAN STUDIES (DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE