동아시아 문학사의 反儒 전통 일고- 金聖嘆의 ≪水滸傳≫ 宋江 評을 중심으로Study on the Anti-Confucian Tradition in East Asia's History of Literature
- Other Titles
- Study on the Anti-Confucian Tradition in East Asia's History of Literature
- Authors
- 이승수
- Issue Date
- Dec-2006
- Publisher
- 한국언어문화학회
- Keywords
- Jin; Shengtan(김성탄); The Water Margin(수호전); Anti-Confucian Tradition (반유전통); Park; Ji-Won(박지원); Lu Xun(노신); Jin; Shengtan(김성탄); The Water Margin(수호전); Anti-Confucian Tradition (반유전통); Park; Ji-Won(박지원); Lu Xun(노신)
- Citation
- 한국언어문화, no.31, pp.283 - 306
- Indexed
- KCI
OTHER
- Journal Title
- 한국언어문화
- Number
- 31
- Start Page
- 283
- End Page
- 306
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/172386
- ISSN
- 1598-1576
- Abstract
- Lee, Seung-Su. 2006. Study on the Anti-Confucian Tradition in East Asia's History of Literature - With Emphasis on the Song, Jiang Part of Jin, Shengtan's ≪The Water Margin≫. This study highlights on Jin, Shengtan's (1608-1661) evaluation of Song, Jiang, which is known as the most epic part of his ≪The Water Margin≫, to examine the anti-Confucian tradition in East Asia's history of literature. For this purpose, the characteristics of character depiction in ≪The Water Margin≫, one of the greatest masterpieces in the history of Chinese novels, and Song, Jiang who is thought to have dual personality in the story. Then, Chapters 35 through 37, where Song, Jiang is exiled to Jiang Zhou was examined to analyze Jin, Shengtan's criticism of Song, Jiang and its meaning. According to Jin, Shengtan, Song, Jiang insists faith and devotion, and endurance and justice, but is actually a very hypocritical and pretentious character who even betrays what he says. Jin, Shengtan was very skeptical about the hypocritical Confucian scholars in the late Ming Dynasty and tried to show his antipathy through his criticism of Song, Jiang. The anti-Confucian ideas were emerged by Zhuang Zi and continued to Jin, Shengtan, Park, Ji Won of Joseon (1737~1805) and Lu, Xun of Modern China (1881~1936). This flow can be described as the anti-Confucian tradition of East Asia's epic literature. This particular piece is a hypothetical discussion of this topic.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 서울 인문과학대학 > 서울 국어국문학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/172386)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.