Detailed Information

Cited 14 time in webofscience Cited 14 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Forward-viewing endoscope for ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors
Park, T.Y.Bang, C.S.Choi, S.H.Yang, Y.J.Shin, S.P.Suk, K.T.Baik, G.H.Kim, D.J.Yoon, Jai Hoon
Issue Date
Nov-2018
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Billroth II operation; Endoscopes; Duodenoscopes; Meta-analysis
Citation
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, v.32, no.11, pp.4598 - 4613
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Volume
32
Number
11
Start Page
4598
End Page
4613
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/3303
DOI
10.1007/s00464-018-6213-1
ISSN
0930-2794
Abstract
Background The forward-viewing endoscope has been increasingly used to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients who underwent Billroth II gastrectomy. This study intended to assess efficacy and safety of the forward-viewing endoscope for ERCP in Billroth II gastrectomy patients compared with conventional side-viewing endoscope using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic review was conducted for studies that evaluated the outcomes of ERCP for patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Random-effect model meta-analyses with subgroup analyses were conducted. The methodological quality of the included publications was evaluated using the risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies. The publication bias was assessed. Results In total, 25 studies (1 randomized, 18 retrospective, 1 prospective, and 5 case series studies) with 2446 patients (499 forward-viewing and 1947 side-viewing endoscopes) were analyzed. The pooled afferent loop intubation rate was higher with the forward-viewing endoscope (90.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 85.6–93.6 vs. 86.8%, 95% CI 82.8–89.9%). The pooled selective cannulation rate was higher with the side-viewing endoscope (92.3%, 95% CI 88.0–95.2 vs. 91.1%, 95% CI 87.2–93.9%). The pooled bowel perforation rate was higher with the side-viewing endoscope (3.6%, 95% CI 2.3–5.7 vs. 3.0%, 95% CI 1.7–5.3%). The pooled pancreatitis rate was higher with the forward-viewing endoscope (5.4%, 95% CI 3.6–8.0 vs. 2.5%, 95% CI 2.3–5.7%). The pooled bleeding rate was higher with the forward-viewing endoscope (3.0%, 95% CI 1.6–5.5 vs. 2.0%, 95% CI 1.4–3.0%). The heterogeneity among the studies was not significant. The publication bias was minimal. Conclusion This meta-analysis indicates that the forward-viewing endoscope is as safe and effective as conventional side-viewing endoscope for ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 내과학교실 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Yoon, Jai Hoon photo

Yoon, Jai Hoon
COLLEGE OF MEDICINE (DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE