근대 학술체계에서의 동아시아 人文傳統에 대한 접근 방식과 “中國學”“Chinese Studies” as an Approach to East Asian Humanistic Traditions in the Modern Academic System
- Other Titles
- “Chinese Studies” as an Approach to East Asian Humanistic Traditions in the Modern Academic System
- Authors
- 민병희
- Issue Date
- 2015
- Publisher
- 한국중국학회
- Keywords
- Chinese Studies; East Asian humanistic traditions; modern academic system; academic disciplines; sinology; area studies; interdisciplinary studies; 중국학; 동아시아인문전통; 근대학술체계; 분과학술체계; 시놀로지; 지역학; 학제간연구; 中國學; 東亞人文傳統; 近代學術系統; 分科學術系統; 漢學; 地區學; 科际整合
- Citation
- 중국학보, no.71, pp.385 - 409
- Journal Title
- 중국학보
- Number
- 71
- Start Page
- 385
- End Page
- 409
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/14025
- ISSN
- 1226-850x
- Abstract
- This article discusses “Chinese studies” as an approach to East Asian humanistic traditions in the modern academic system. Since the modern academic system has been developed in the Western traditions, it is very difficult to approach East Asian humanistic traditions which have their own framework as a knowledge system which is very different from those in the Western traditions in modern academic system. It explores three different ways of approaching to East Asian humanistic traditions in the contemporary Korean academic environment: Approach in modern academic disciplines; preserved traditional approach; and “Chinese studies.” Those approaches have discretely their own problems as an approach to East Asian humanistic traditions. This article pays particular attention to the approach of “Chinese studies” because of the current popularity of “Chinese studies” in Korea and its potential as the an alternative to those two aforementioned approaches. In this article, I examine the approach of “Chinese studies” in two different categories: one is Chinese studies developed from traditional sinology and the other is that from “area studies.” The possibilities of “Chinese studies” as an approach to East Asian humanistic traditions depends on how it facilitates the interdisciplinary approaches, overcomes the pitfalls of ambiguity as an academic discipline and methodology, and liberates itself from the ideologically shadowed past as a strategically developed academic field.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Education > Department of History Education > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/14025)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.