지식과 권력의 규범적 관계 모색: 밀턴의 도덕적 지식과 이성적 정체(政體)Towards a Normative Relationship Between Power and Knowledge: Milton's Moral Knowledge and Ideal Polity
- Other Titles
- Towards a Normative Relationship Between Power and Knowledge: Milton's Moral Knowledge and Ideal Polity
- Authors
- 이종우
- Issue Date
- 2002
- Publisher
- 한국중세근세영문학회
- Keywords
- Milton; power; moral knowledge; utility; Eikonoklastes; Tenure
of Kings and Magistrates; King' s trial; ideal polity; Commonwealth; 밀턴; 권력; 도덕적 지식; 유용성; 우상타파론; 왕과 관리의 재직
조건; 왕의 처형; 이상적 정체; 공화정
- Citation
- 중세근세영문학, v.12, no.2, pp.307 - 331
- Journal Title
- 중세근세영문학
- Volume
- 12
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 307
- End Page
- 331
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/26939
- ISSN
- 1738-2556
- Abstract
- This essay discusses the problem of the relationship between power and
knowledge, considering Milton's idea that true knowledge can provide the
conditions for a thorough reform of society. In his political tracts, Milton
expresses the idea that a new formation of political information and
knowledge is required to limit the manipulative power of the politicians or
partisan writers over susceptible people. According to Milton, the means of
solving the problem of social control which stands in the way of a general
reformation is to ensure the better circulation of knowledge and proper
ethics.
The process of King Charles I's condemnation and the event of his
execution in 1649 raised some controversies about whether his trial was
justified and the meanings that it had politically. Many pamphlets
condemning the King or Parliament were published that voiced different
views and explanations of the event. Royalists claimed that the execution
was not carried out according to the proper procedures of the law. This view was opposed by Milton who argued in his political tracts that the
King was a tyrant rather than a just ruler who abused his power and broke
his contract with the people. Therefore, his execution was fully justified.
Milton's concerns were not limited to the exploration of the King's
wrong-doing nor the attacks of those who disagreed with him. He was also
concerned with the problem of rhetoric which was shrewdly employed by
the Royalist apologists to deceive the opponents. In Eikonoklastes, he aims
to expose the crimes of King's regime. By showing how much of King's
rule was dependent upon ill-conceived political machinations rather than a
proper governmental policy, he attempts to demystify the King's image and
to counter the false forms of knowledge created by Royalist propaganda.
According to his argument, the King was not a locus of political authority
rooted in intellectual leadership supported by true knowledge but a key
figure in political imposture armed with the vanity of mere words.
Although the King was far from being the earthly manifestation of the
godly rule which Milton expected at the time, the people, nevertheless,
tended to approve his tyrannical rule and engage in his idolatry.
In this context, Milton's self-appointed task was to ensure that the
people would be equipped with the ability to choose the interpretation
which would best reveal the true nature of the King's words and deeds so
that they could become no longer his dupes but his judges. As Milton
continually stresses, the power of the state remains the province of the
people rather than being inherent in authority. Therefore, as he suggests in
Eikonoklastes, there is a need for active readership on the part of the
English people in responding to Charles's regime and his carefully-crafted
image. As Milton emphasizes in his political tracts of late 1640s and
1650s, it is very important for the readers to see a political situation
correctly. One model he suggests is to break the "double sense deluding."
It is a model of reading based on reason and judgement that can produce
the moral knowledge necessary for the construction of an ideal polity rather
than on the external authority of an institution. Warning about the moral
and epistemological failure of the King's regime, Milton claims that an ideal new polity should base itself in the search for moral knowledge. The
moral knowledge can be epitomized as following: "Truth is but Justice in
our knowledge, and justice is but Truth in our practice." This knowledge,
if understood properly, can provide the means to tackle some of the
political problems of seventeenth-century England and lead to the creation
of an ideal polity.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Liberal Arts > Department of English Language and Literature > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.