Detailed Information

Cited 15 time in webofscience Cited 16 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Interplay of Top-down Institutional Pressures and Bottom-up Responses of Transition Economy Firms on FDI Entry Mode Choices

Authors
Chung, Chris ChangwhaXiao, Simon ShufengLee, Jeoung YulKang, Jingoo
Issue Date
Oct-2016
Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
Keywords
Institutional pressures; Institutional freedom; Foreign direct investment; Outward international joint ventures; Transition economies; China
Citation
MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, v.56, no.5, pp.699 - 732
Journal Title
MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW
Volume
56
Number
5
Start Page
699
End Page
732
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hongik/handle/2020.sw.hongik/7350
DOI
10.1007/s11575-015-0256-5
ISSN
0938-8249
Abstract
This study examines the role of institutions in explaining the FDI entry mode choices of transition economy firms. Advancing an institution-based view of international business strategy, the paper proposes a model of interactive institutional processes that incorporates both top-down institutional pressures and the bottom-up heterogeneous responses of individual firms to such pressures. The findings are based on a sample of 594 outward FDI entries made by Chinese firms. The results indicate that institutional pressures exerted by the home country government have a significant effect on outward FDI ownership decisions, such that firms facing greater institutional pressures are more inclined to choose outward international joint ventures (OIJVs) over wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. However, the effect of institutional government pressures on FDI entry mode choices is weaker for firms which are less dependent on the Chinese government for resources and thus enjoy more institutional freedom. Specifically, the ownership structures of Chinese firms moderate the positive effect of home country government pressures on the choice of OIJVs, such that the positive effect is weaker for modernized firms (i.e., newly created private and reformed incorporated firms) than conventional firms (i.e., state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and collectives). The positive effect is weaker for collectives than SOEs, while the positive effect is weaker for private firms than reformed firms (i.e., private firms < reformed firms < collectives < SOEs).
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Business Management > Global Business Administration Major > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Jeoung Yul photo

Lee, Jeoung Yul
College of Business Management (Major in Business Management)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE