Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

최병헌의 불교 인식과 기독교 변증 - 「성산명경」의 불교 논쟁을 중심으로Buddhistic Thought and Christian Dialectic of Choe Byeong-heon - Focus on Buddhist Arguments of “Seongsanmyeonggyeong”

Other Titles
Buddhistic Thought and Christian Dialectic of Choe Byeong-heon - Focus on Buddhist Arguments of “Seongsanmyeonggyeong”
Authors
차봉준
Issue Date
Aug-2012
Publisher
한국문학과종교학회
Keywords
개화기 소설(Novels from the Enlightenment Period); 기독교 문학(Christian literature); 만종일련(Manjongillyeon); 불교적 세계관(Buddhistic view of the world); 「성산명경」(" Seongsanmyeonggyeong" ); 기독교 변증(Christian dialectic); 최병헌(Choe Byeong-heon).
Citation
문학과 종교, v.17, no.2, pp.209 - 229
Journal Title
문학과 종교
Volume
17
Number
2
Start Page
209
End Page
229
URI
http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/12948
ISSN
1229-5620
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to consider “Seongsanmyeonggyeong”, a Christian short story of Choe Byeong-heon, the very first dialectical theologian of Korean Christianity, within the connectivity with Manjongillyeon, which is his theological thought. Choe Byeong-heon presents the religious demonstration of Christianity and traditional religions, such as Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism, by focusing on the arguments of ‘Shin Cheon-ong’ and three characters of the short story. This study focuses on analyzing the logical evidence which demonstrates the superiority of Christianity by refuting the critical recognition and fictiveness of Buddhism through the developed arguments between ‘Shin Cheon-ong’ and ‘Won-gak’. Especially, it presumes the falsity of Buddhism in three perspectives, such as Theism, Eschatology and Christian theology, which Choe Byeong-heon has consistently applied to the all religions in Christian demonstration. Moreover, it drew attention that Choe Byeong-heon criticizes the fictiveness of Buddhism in two aspects in this study. First of all, the argument is based on the fictiveness inherent in the birth of Sakyamuni and the miracle stories, and the illogic within the Buddhist creationism. The Christian dialectic is valid in the way that the miracles and creationism of Buddha lack in preciseness and logical causality compared to the birth and miracles of Jesus, and the creationism of Christianity. Second is the argument on the antisocial and unethical aspect on the tradition of monks leaving home in Buddhism. Additionally, the unethical aspect of Buddhism raises criticism, which originated from the mistaken impression on the nature and human viewed in monistic perspectives. In conclusion, this study confirms the fact that “Seongsanmyeonggyeong” conforms to Christian dialectic and the critical impression on Buddhism as shown in Manjongillyeon, Choe Byeong-heon's theological ideology.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Cha, Bong Jun photo

Cha, Bong Jun
Colleges (Baird College of General Education)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE