Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Performance Comparison and Visualization of AI-Generated-Image Detection Methodsopen access

Authors
Park, DaeeolNa, HyunsikChoi, Daeseon
Issue Date
Apr-2024
Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
Keywords
Artificial intelligence; Transformers; Generative adversarial networks; Training; Solid modeling; Generators; Feature extraction; Generative AI; AI-generated-image detection; synthetic-image detection; performance comparison; GAN; diffusion model; transformer; Grad-CAM; t-SNE
Citation
IEEE ACCESS, v.12, pp 62609 - 62627
Pages
19
Journal Title
IEEE ACCESS
Volume
12
Start Page
62609
End Page
62627
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/49751
DOI
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3394250
ISSN
2169-3536
Abstract
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized the field of image generation. This has concurrently escalated social problems and concerns related to AI image generation, underscoring the necessity for an effective AI-generated-image detection method. Therefore, numerous methods for detecting AI-generated images have been developed, but there remains a need for research comparing the effectiveness of and visualizing these detection methods. In this study, we classify AI-generated-image detection methods by the image features they use and compare their generalization performance in detecting AI-generated images of different types. We selected five AI-generated-image detection methods for performance evaluation and selected vision transformer as an additional method for comparison. We use two types of training datasets, i.e., ProGAN and latent diffusion; combine existing AI-generated-image test datasets into a diverse test dataset; and divide them into three types of generative models, i.e., generative adversarial network (GAN), diffusion, and transformer, to evaluate the comprehensive performance of the detection methods. We also analyze their detection performance on images with data augmentation, considering scenarios that make it difficult to detect AI-generated images. Grad-CAM and t-SNE are used to visualize the detection area and data distribution of each detection method. As a result, we determine that artifact-feature-based detection performs well on GAN and real images, whereas image-encoder-feature-based detection performs well on diffusion and transformer images. In summary, our research analyzes the comparative detection performance of various AI-generated-image detection methods, identifies their limitations, and suggests directions for further research.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
College of Information Technology > School of Software > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Choi, Daeseon photo

Choi, Daeseon
College of Information Technology (School of Software)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE