댄스스포츠 선수들의 파트너 갈등 개념구조 및 척도개발The Conceptional Structure and Development of Partner Conflicts Dancesport Competetitor
- Authors
- 김진아; 홍준희; 김상범
- Issue Date
- 2015
- Publisher
- 한국체육과학회
- Keywords
- dancesport; partner’s conflict; scale development
- Citation
- 한국체육과학회지, v.24, no.2, pp 491 - 505
- Pages
- 15
- Journal Title
- 한국체육과학회지
- Volume
- 24
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 491
- End Page
- 505
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/11010
- ISSN
- 1226-0258
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study was to develop the conflict scale of dancesport athletes. this study structured the concept of conflict between partners of dancesport athletes, developed the scale, and completed the validity test of conflict scale for dancesport athletes. The questionnaire were collected from total 385 dancesport athletes, who were participated in dancesport competition with over 3 events. The collected data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis. The results of this study identify disgrace factor(7 questions), skill shortage factor(5 questions), caring shortage factor(5 questions), personal responsibility factor(4 questions), negotiation shortage factor(4 questions), opinion conflict factor(3 questions). Total 6 factors 28 questions were developed.
The purpose of this study was to develop the conflict scale of dancesport athletes. this study structured the concept of conflict between partners of dancesport athletes, developed the scale, and completed the validity test of conflict scale for dancesport athletes. The questionnaire were collected from total 385 dancesport athletes, who were participated in dancesport competition with over 3 events. The collected data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis. The results of this study identify disgrace factor(7 questions), skill shortage factor(5 questions), caring shortage factor(5 questions), personal responsibility factor(4 questions), negotiation shortage factor(4 questions), opinion conflict factor(3 questions). Total 6 factors 28 questions were developed.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Sport Science > School of Sports Sciences > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.