Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

신동북아 지역주의와 문화의 의미The Meaning of Culture in New Northeast Asian Regionalism

Authors
김세일김홍중
Issue Date
2013
Publisher
중앙대학교 외국학연구소
Keywords
세계화; 신동북아; 지역주의; 문화주의; 세방화; Globalization; New Northeast Asia; Regionalism; Culturalism; Glocalization
Citation
외국학연구, no.25, pp 337 - 364
Pages
28
Journal Title
외국학연구
Number
25
Start Page
337
End Page
364
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/19573
DOI
10.15755/jfs.2013..25.337
ISSN
2288-4599
Abstract
This work is devoted to the opportunities and matters for the establishment of a new regionalism of Northeast Asia. At the end of the 20th century glocalization has emerged as a reaction against globalization. Glocalization is a compound phenomenon of globalization and localization in a country. As a result of glocalization various regional communities, such as the EU, NAFTA and ASEAN appeared. These organizations for regional supernational cooperation defend their own economic and regional interests and identities from various standards of global organizations like WTO, IMF and IDA. The region of Northeast Asia, however, has not yet built a regional collaborative system that provides political and economic stability to the members of the region(China, Japan, Russia and the Korean peninsula). This article analyzes the causes of the difficulties in establishing a regional collaborative system in Northeast Asia, where there are not only the most powerful economic and military force in the world, but also extremely valuable historical and cultural inheritance. The author supposes that the main cause of the past regional problems is associated with geopolitical and economic viewpoints on the region. The influence of the Cold War and the historical feud in this region gets inhibits mutual understanding and cooperation. The geopolitical and economic approaches to neighboring countries always relies on ethnocentrism. To establish a new order in this region, the author offers a cultural and dialogical approach to the knowledge of neighboring countries. For that, the author attempts to apply the following theories and concepts to the understanding of other countries: the theory of Contemporary English Culturalism, the ‘thick description’ concept of C. Geerts, and the dialogue theory of M. Bakhtin.
This work is devoted to the opportunities and matters for the establishment of a new regionalism of Northeast Asia. At the end of the 20th century glocalization has emerged as a reaction against globalization. Glocalization is a compound phenomenon of globalization and localization in a country. As a result of glocalization various regional communities, such as the EU, NAFTA and ASEAN appeared. These organizations for regional supernational cooperation defend their own economic and regional interests and identities from various standards of global organizations like WTO, IMF and IDA. The region of Northeast Asia, however, has not yet built a regional collaborative system that provides political and economic stability to the members of the region(China, Japan, Russia and the Korean peninsula). This article analyzes the causes of the difficulties in establishing a regional collaborative system in Northeast Asia, where there are not only the most powerful economic and military force in the world, but also extremely valuable historical and cultural inheritance. The author supposes that the main cause of the past regional problems is associated with geopolitical and economic viewpoints on the region. The influence of the Cold War and the historical feud in this region gets inhibits mutual understanding and cooperation. The geopolitical and economic approaches to neighboring countries always relies on ethnocentrism. To establish a new order in this region, the author offers a cultural and dialogical approach to the knowledge of neighboring countries. For that, the author attempts to apply the following theories and concepts to the understanding of other countries: the theory of Contemporary English Culturalism, the ‘thick description’ concept of C. Geerts, and the dialogue theory of M. Bakhtin.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Humanities > ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Se Il photo

Kim, Se Il
인문대학 (러시아어문학)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE