Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Differential effect of concurrent chemotherapy regimen on clinical outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

Authors
Kim, EunjiKim, KyuboOh, Do HoonHan, Sae-WonKim, Tae-YouJung, Seung-YongPark, Kyu JooKang, Gyeong HoonChie, Eui Kyu
Issue Date
Mar-2019
Publisher
IMPRIMATUR PUBLICATIONS
Keywords
chemoradiotherapy; chemotherapy regimen; neoadjuvant; rectal cancer
Citation
JOURNAL OF BUON, v.24, no.2, pp 470 - 478
Pages
9
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF BUON
Volume
24
Number
2
Start Page
470
End Page
478
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/44865
ISSN
1107-0625
2241-6293
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differential effect of chemotherapy regimen in preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: The medical records of 279 patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by surgery for cT3/4 rectal cancer from 2003 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-four patients were treated with one cycle of i.v. bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) during 1st week (group A), 214 patients with two cycles of i.v. bolus 5-FU during 1st and 5th week (group B), and 31 patients with oral capecitabine on the days with radiotherapy (group C). Propensity score matching was performed between three groups. Results: Median follow-up was 60.1 months. Five-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 91.2, 83.3, 75.0, and 84.5%, respectively. Thirty-one patients per group were allocated to three groups via propensity score matching. On univariate analysis, concurrent chemotherapy regimen was not a significant prognostic factor for survival outcomes in the matched group analysis (OS, p=0.175; DFS, p=0.481; DMFS, p=0.515; LRFS, p=0.456). In addition, there was no significant difference in the sphincter preserving surgery rate, circumferential resection margin status, and pathologic response between three groups (p=0.441, 1.000, 0.818, respectively). As regards to treatment-related toxicity, 9 patients showed grade 3 neutropenia in group B, while there was no grade 3 or higher toxicity in groups A and C. Conclusion: The concurrent chemotherapy regimen (5-FU #1 vs 5-FU #2 vs capecitabine) did not have a significant effect on treatment outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant CRT.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE