Comparison of MDO methods with mathematical examples
- Authors
- Yi, Sang-il; Shin, Jung-kyu; PARK, GYUNG JIN
- Issue Date
- May-2008
- Publisher
- Springer Verlag
- Keywords
- AAO; BLISS; CO; CSSO; IDF; MDF; MDOIS; Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO)
- Citation
- Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, v.35, no.5, pp 391 - 402
- Pages
- 12
- Indexed
- SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
- Volume
- 35
- Number
- 5
- Start Page
- 391
- End Page
- 402
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/43072
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00158-007-0150-2
- ISSN
- 1615-147X
1615-1488
- Abstract
- Recently, engineering systems are quite large and complicated. The design requirements are fairly complex and it is not easy to satisfy them by considering only one discipline. Therefore, a design methodology that can consider various disciplines is needed. Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) is an emerging optimization method that considers a design environment with multiple disciplines. Seven methods have been proposed for MDO. They are Multiple-discipline-feasible (MDF), Individual-discipline-feasible (IDF), All-at-once (AAO), Concurrent subspace optimization (CSSO), Collaborative optimization (CO), Bi-level integrated system synthesis (BLISS), and Multidisciplinary design optimization based on independent subspaces (MDOIS). Through several mathematical examples, the performances of the methods are evaluated and compared. Specific requirements are defined for comparison and new types of mathematical problems are defined based on the requirements. All the methods are coded and the performances of the methods are compared qualitatively and quantitatively. © 2007 Springer-Verlag.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES > DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/43072)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.