Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Protein supplementation improves muscle mass and physical performance in undernourished prefrail and frail elderly subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialopen access

Authors
Park, YongsoonChoi, Jeong-EunHwang, Hwan-Sik
Issue Date
Nov-2018
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Keywords
protein supplementation; muscle mass; frailty; elderly; clinical trial; malnutrition
Citation
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, v.108, no.5, pp.1026 - 1033
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume
108
Number
5
Start Page
1026
End Page
1033
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/hanyang/handle/2021.sw.hanyang/149059
DOI
10.1093/ajcn/nqy214
ISSN
0002-9165
Abstract
Background: Age-related loss of muscle mass and function is a major component of frailty. Nutrition supplementation with exercise is an effective strategy to decrease frailty by preventing sarcopenia, but the effect of protein alone is controversial. Objective: The present study was performed to investigate a dose-dependent effect of protein supplementation on muscle mass and frailty in prefrail or frail malnourished elderly people. Design: A 12-wk double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in elderly subjects aged 70-85 y with >= 1 of the Cardiovascular Health Study frailty criteria and a Mini Nutritional Assessment score <= 23.5 (n = 120). Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: 0.8, 1.2, or 1.5 g protein . kg(-1) . d(-1), with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis. Primary outcomes were appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: After the 12-wk intervention, the 1.5-g protein . kg(-1) . d(-1) group had higher ASM (mean +/- SD: 0.52 +/- 0.64 compared with 0.08 +/- 0.68 kg, P = 0.036) and SMI (ASM/weight: 0.87% +/- 0.69% compared with 0.15% +/- 0.89%, P = 0.039; ASM/BMI: 0.02 +/- 0.03 compared with 0.00 +/- 0.04, P = 0.033; ASM: fat ratio: 0.04 +/- 0.11 compared with -0.02 +/- 0.10, P = 0.025) than the 0.8-g protein . kg(-1) . d(-1) group. In addition, gait speed was improved in the 1.5-g protein . kg(-1) . d(-1) group compared with the 0.8-g protein . kg(-1) . d(-1) group (0.09 +/- 0.07 compared with 0.04 +/- 0.07 m/s, P = 0.039). There were no significant differences between the 1.2- and 0.8-g protein . kg(-1) . d(-1) groups in muscle mass and physical performance. No harmful adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: The present study indicates that protein intake of 1.5 g . kg(-1) . d(-1) has the most beneficial effects in regard to preventing sarcopenia and frailty compared with protein intakes of 0.8 and 1.2 g . kg(-1) . d(-1) in prefrail or frail elderly subjects at risk of malnutrition.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
서울 의과대학 > 서울 가정의학교실 > 1. Journal Articles
서울 생활과학대학 > 서울 식품영양학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Yong soon photo

Park, Yong soon
COLLEGE OF HUMAN ECOLOGY (DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & NUTRITION)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE